Eating while on the road

Eating lean while you're on the road can be a challenge.

It's hard to find a restaurant where you can eat non-fattening food at a reasonable price. When I'm lucky, I find myself in a hotel that has a microwave oven and that's close to a supermarket. Usually though, that's not an option.

Tonight I'll be trying a seafood restaurant. Seafood offers a good number of lean, nutritious options, but it isn't cheap. I'm trying it anyway, though; after all, I went cheap for lunch. (I brought my own sandwich, thus saving my employer the cost of my lunch.) Besides, I figure that if I'm going to be travelling, I should same some of the local cuisine instead of always eating at generic chain restaurants.

Carrying luggage around

There's a certain piece of luggage that I normally use on business trips. It has wheels and an extendable handle, allowing the weary traveler to simply wheel this thing around.

Guess what? I almost never use that feature.

I'd rather carry the bag around. First, this helps build up my shoulder and forearm muscles, and it helps burn calories. This is really helpful when you've spent most of the day sitting in an airplane with no place to go.

And second, I can get around much more quickly when I carry this bag around rather than dragging it behind me. Ditto for my heavy laptop bag.

One of my co-workers -- a fairly tall fella -- said that he needs a small laptop. "I don't want to get tired from carrying my laptop around," he said. "That's why I need one that's very small and very light." I won't begrudge him that, but since you pay a price premium for small laptops, I'd rather own a larger one and then build up the strength needed to carry it around. Heck, my laptop is very heavy, and I carry a massive amount of other stuff in the same bag. Do I travel a lot? Not really, but I do have to carry this bag to work everyday. I honestly don't mind.

Heavy duty work

I've had a pretty intense calorie-burning weekend. It has involved heavy resistance training, shoveling mulch, tree planting, mowing the lawn, turning over compost, filling up driveway cracks, and more. Later today, I will do more lawn mowing, shovel more mulch, and get some cardio work done. A lot of that will be in the blazing sun.

I hate this.

Ten Common Copyrighting Problems

Here is another list from that book I mentioned earlier, Copy Writing For Dummies. The author's wording is a bit awkward, though. In some of these item titles, he describes the problem. In others though, he hints at a solution. The full cures for these problems are described in the book.

• Establishing focus when your message is diffuse
  
• Getting specific when your writing is vague
  
• Getting real when your copy is jargon-filled
  
• Speaking the customer's language when the tone is wrong
  
• Talking about the customer when your copy is self-flattering
  
• Using active words to fight the "flat"
  
• Being bold when your pitch is too soft
  
• Trimming text when your copy is wordy
  
• Making an offer when your conclusion is wilting
  
• Going back to the source when you have writer's block
  

It's Friday the 13th! Whoopee-doo.

It's Friday the 13th. Eaugh. You know what that means.

This entire week has not been going well for me, so I'm not exactly fazed by this omen of bad luck, though.

Ten Things To Do Before Writing Marketing Copy

The following list is from the book, Writing Copy for Dummies by Jonathan Kranz. He calls these "Ten Things You Should Always Do Before Writing" (by which he means copywriting).

• Creating the Team
  
• Clarifying the Purpose
  
• Setting the Benchmarks
  
• Gathering the Facts
  
• Resolving the Format
  
• Establishing the Copy Points
  
• Turning Features into Benefits
  
• Profiling the Customer
  
• Identifying the Marketing Challenges
  
• Setting the Tone
  

Merging in traffic

Quick! What is the most important thing to remember when merging onto a highway?

The most important thing to remember, of course, is that you should only merge when you have an opening. In other words, look in your mirror and over your shoulder for a gap into which you can merge.

The next most important thing to bear in mind, however, is that you must match the speed of the highway traffic. In other words, you should accelerate until you match the highway speed and then merge. Sadly, so many people don’t seem to understand the importance of this.

I remember being stuck behind this woman on a highway in California once. We were both on the on ramp, but she apparently decided to come to a complete halt before merging into the traffic stream. In the meantime, I was freaking out. I was yelling, “Don’t come to a complete stop before you merge, lady!” Why? Because that just makes merging more difficult. It’s also plenty dangerous, since it greatly increases the risk that someone will ram into your rear.

Made things difficult for me too, since I was stuck behind her. In other words, I had to come to a complete halt as well, even though I knew better.

Just last night, I had to keep tapping my horn at this one motorist. He was trying to merge into my traffic lane, but instead of accelerating, he slowed down practically to a crawl. In the meantime, I felt like yelling, “Go ahead and merge, already!” He apprently didn’t understand that if vehicles like mine slowed down because he was moving at a snail’s pace, then we risked being rear-ended as well.

Conversel, there was this one other fella who was trying to get off the highway. Instead of driving firmly onto the off-ramp though, he slowed down and changed lanes slowly, almost painstakingly. The result? He occuped both lanes for an obscene amount of time, so my car, as well as the ones behind me, had to slow down to dangerous speeds as well. Ugh.

Feeling irritable

I'm busy doing housework again late tonight -- laundry and cleaning. I have so much tidying to do, and I finished a good amount of yard work and digging as well. And it's warm and humid as well, which is making me feel very, very irritable. Ugh.

Gotta get ready for a business trip as well. Argh.

I am feeling so very irritable. I know I've said that, but I'm really on edge right now. I'm going to start running the air conditioner again, even though it'll drive my electric bill up. Yeesh.

Watching movies as a kid

When I was growing up, our family almost never watched movies right from the start. Rather, our parents insisted on walking into a movie midway through the story. Only once did I ever catch a movie right from the start -- an obscure Pinocchio movie that I watched on my fifth birthday. Little did I know at the time that I would never get that experience again until I reached my teens and could watch movies on my own.

I can understand missing the start of a movie once or twice, but consistently? Clearly, something is wrong.

The problem was that our family never properly appreciated the artistry that goes into a good movie. Start watching midway through, and you don't know what all the backstory is. You wind up guessing needlessly, perhaps missing some of the humor and dramatic subtleties.

Oh, and of course, you have to sit through maybe 15-20 minutes of idle time between films as you wait for the next showing. Talk about poor use of time!

Ultimately, this was all caused by poor use of time. We'd be out and about, shopping or having dinner. Well, with judicious planning, we could have taken a break from the shopping to watch the movie, and then resumed shopping afterwards if necessary. That never happened, though.

So what's the big deal, one might ask? After all, you still got to watch the film, right? True, but one is robbed of the experience of seeing the story unfold as it should. One can still enjoy the film, but one cannot savor its full experience. It's like hoping for a rich steak and settling for hamburger instead.

Sledge Hammer

Just finished watching the final DVD of the 80s cult hit, "Sledge Hammer." Now that was a clever show. David Rasche is a comedic genius who should have won an Emmy. Anne-Marie Martin was also perfectly cast in her role.

Too bad this show didn't get the exposure that it needed. I do have to give the network credit for airing it in the first place, though. That's more than what most TV suits would have done.

Take names to kick networking b*tt

The following has been excerpted from an article by Keith Ferrazzi, "The 10 Secrets of a Master Networker." It's good advice.

"I'm constantly ripping out lists in magazines. I was one of Crain's '40 under 40' when I was 30. Interestingly enough, I had been ripping out 40-under-40 lists for years and continue to do so. Those are individuals who somebody has spent enough time to identify as an up-and-comer, a mover, an intellectual, and these are the kinds of people I want to surround myself with. I rip out lists of top CEOs, most admired CEOs, regional lists. A recent book by Richard Saul Wurman lists the 1,000 most creative people in the United States. It's fantastic."

Either Ferrazzi or his assistant enters the gathered names into a database. He has call sheets by region, listing the people he knows and those he'd like to know, and when he's in town, he phones all of them. The numbers are also put into his two PalmPilots, one that has names strictly relating to the particular business he's involved in at the moment (YaYa now) and another that contains his own personal contacts. There are more than 5,000 contacts in all, some of them people Ferrazzi doesn't know yet. Those are what he calls "aspirational contacts."

He pulls out his Palm and shows me the contact information for Richard Branson, chairman of the Virgin empire. "I don't know him. But I want to," he says. Then he scrolls down and comes to Howard Stringer, CEO of Sony Corp. of America. "He was on my aspirational list once. I now know Howard," he notes.

Celebrities and money

Here's what one netter wrote about Bill Cosby and financial management. I think it's worth noting.

Bill Cosby is one of the richest men in show business now of course, but in the '70s he was a total mess (broke and deeply in debt) due to bad investments, unpaid taxes, and a thieving manager.* He talked in one interview about how he was world famous, had a hit comedy record, could dial up half of the Hollywood A-list by memory, but he wasn't able to buy one of his kids a birthday present because he had no cash and all of his cards were not just declined but seized, and how he had to borrow the money from a fan who was in the toy store (who he said he still sends gifts to on his daughter's birthday). His advice to all up-n'-comers is "NEVER EVER EVER give anybody but your wife the power to sign your checks, and only let your wife do it if you've been married a while and have kids and you 100% trust her" (i.e. not some newlywed trophy wife or Sharon-Stone-from-Casino character). This would seem a no brainer, but apparently there are people who allow their managers to just have full access to everything they make.

Sadly, many celebrities with beaucoup megabucks never learn these lessons.

MS Vista is infuriating!

MS Windows is an abominable product line, and Vista is especially horrible. Ugh!

Okay, sure. It accomplished a lot of nifty things. The problem is that the Microsoft designers, thinking like a bunch of high school students, decided to focus on superficial 'gee whiz' features to the deteriment of functionality.

When you boot up the computer, it should NOT attempt to do too many things in the background. When you call up Windows Explorer, it should come up fairly quickly, without a lot of pre-processing; after all, it's primary function is to let the user navigate through the directory structure, and that shouldn't take much effort at all. Instead though, calling this program up can be a slow and tedious process, all because Microsoft insists on doing so much stuff in the background. (What exactly? I don't know, but I'm sure that generating thumbnail images and/or picture indices is one of them. Who cares about that?!?!? You don't do that sort of thing unless you KNOW that the user will be navigating to the folders in question.)

Great googly moogly.

Geekiness and fandom

Somebody once said the following:

Even among men, obsessions are not treated equally. Fill a room with Star Trek memorabilia and you're a geek. Fill it with New England Patriots merchandise (along with a nice expensive fathead) and you're a super-fan.

True. Unfortunate, but true.

Preparing for a layoff -- well in advance

The following bit of advice came from an article titled "Surving a Layoff." I don't know who originally wrote it, as the fella who passed this on to me didn't include that info. For this reason, I'm only posting a brief excerpt.

Get everything you've been promised in writing. Remember, you cannot be forced to sign something on the spot. Take the paperwork with you, and agree to drop it off after you've had time to review it with a cool head. Consult a lawyer if need be -- especially if a lot of money is on the line or if you were axed before a bonus, commission, vesting period, or some other important deadline. Then schedule a time to come back with questions and show off your new golf swing. If you are dismissed "with cause," however, your former employer may not owe you a cent.

Gas prices

While driving to work today, I came across a guy standing by the side of the road. He was wearing a white T-shirt with a handwritten message that said, "Fuel up only once a week!" in an obvious attempt to protest gas prices. He also held up a sign that said, "Politicians, this is your job!"

I understand his frustration and his obvious desperation. Still, that's just no solution. Fuel up only once a week? That's easier said that done. This suggestion is only marginally better than those idiotic "Boycott gas on Wednesday!" campaigns or those petitions for gas companies to lower their prices.

And in what sense is this the job of politicians? Sure politicos be doing something? Maybe; I won't debate that point right now. But to simply declare that this is the politicians' job is woefully simplistic at best.

Batman and Robin on the SuperFriends

A few weeks ago, I saw a few episodes of the first season SuperFriends on the Boomerang Channel. It was interesting to see how very differently Batman and Robin had been portrayed back then. Neither one of them ever hit anyone, in keeping with the sanitized standards of the seventies. Nevertheless, they were written in a much more appealing way than in subsequent SuperFriends incarnations.

In most of the subsequent seasons, Batman and Robin would always win battles by swinging from one place to another and wielding whatever outlandish Bat-paraphernalia happened to be convenient. (An umbrella in your utility belt, Robin? Really?) Not so in the first season. The gadgetry was kept to a minimum. Instead of using some elaborate Bat-pulley mechanism to traverse some ski lift cables, for example, they simply slid down using their batarangs.

And they were written so as to focus on their intellect rather than their gadgetry. That was great.

ICS vs. ELISPOT

Blood cells need to be killed for detection via intracellular cytoplasmic staining, (ICS) whereas they survive ELISPOT assays unaffected. These cells can thus be reused for subsequent testing in other platforms (including ICS itself) or the can be frozen for retesting. If necessary, ELISPOT assays even permit serial testing of the very same cells in different assay formats. This optional maximization of sample resources can be critical when conducting clinical trials in which the number of peripheral blood mononuclear cells available is a limiting factor.

In ICS, cells are killed at some supposedly ideal time point and the intracellular cytokine content is measured. In ELISPOT assays however, the cytokine is continuously captured around the secreting cell during incubation time. This generates the characteristic ELISPOT spots long after the secretion process has halted. This basic feature makes ELISPOT assays largely independent of the secretion kinetics of the individual cells. This is valuable because the kinetics of T cell cytokine secretion is unsynchronized even when a single T cell clone is tested. This principle of nonsychronization is even more relevant when using a potential polyclonal population of effector cells reacting to the diverse APC population.

In addition, ELISPOT assays lend themselves more thorougly to high-throughput testing. The initial phases of both ICS and ELISPOT assays are identical whenit comes to setting up the activation cultures. In addition, the subsequent processing of the cells, including the washing steps, require about the same amount of time. However, the actual data acquisition and analysis phases are much shorter for ELISPOT assays. Typically, ELISPOT footprints generated by 300,000 PBMCs per well can be analyzes from a single image with an acquisition and analysis time of about three seconds per 300,000 cells.

Habermas on Post-Modernism

A few words from philosopher Gary Habermas on post-modernism:

Postmodernism is a loose coalition of diverse thinkers from several different academic disciplines, so it is difficult to characterize postmodernism in a way that would be fair to this diversity. Still, it is possible to provide a fairly accurate characterization of postmodernism in general, since it friends and foes understand it well enough to debate its strengths and weaknesses.

As a philosophical standpoint, postmodernism is primarily a reinterpretation of what knowledge is and what counts as knowledge. More broadly, it represents a form of cultural relativism about such things as reality, truth, reason, value, linguistic meaning, the self and other notions. On a postmodernist view, there is no such thing as objective reality, truth, value, reason and so forth. All these are social constructions, creations of linguistic practices and, as such, are relative not to individuals, but to social groups that share a narrative.

Postmodernism denies the correspondence theory, claiming that truth is simply a contingent creation of language which expresses customs, emotions, and values embedded in a community’s linguistic practices. For the postmodernist, if one claims to have the truth in the correspondence sense, this assertion is a power move that victimizes those judged not to have the truth.

He is not a fan. Not at all.

This scene lacked credibility

Okay, I watched this episode of The Hardy Boys/Nancy Drew Mysteries on DVD. It's the episode where Janet Louise Johnson was introduced as Pamela Sue Martin's replacement as Nancy Drew. You can see some vidcaps here.

In this silly scene, Nancy accosts the Hardy boys, confronting them in disguise. She was wearing some sort of mask (which, unfortunately, is not shown in the aforementioned vidcaps). This mask covered the upper part of her face, but left the lower part quite visible.

Why is this silly? Because Ms. Johnson (now Janet Julian) has this great big mark on her left cheek, near her mouth. It's not unattractive by any means, but it is distinctive. The boys should have immediately recognized her based on this mark alone.