As far as I'm concerned, the show is good because it's one of the few where what they do is more important than how they look, what their personalities are, how smooth their dialogue is, whether they sexually desirable, whether they are cool, whether the production is slick etc. At it's peak, the show was near unique in that they showed the backroom stuff. They showed not just the slickly performed payoff at the end, but how they built their rig, the scale rigs they built to try out ideas, the fuckups, the deadends, the rigs that didn't work.
It broke out of the mould in which every show must be based slick showiness, to the exclusion of substance.
It is slowly falling back into the boring standard mould, and is getting less and less to my taste because of it.
Tuesday, December 23, 2008
Mythbusters
I liked the following comment that somebody made regarding the Discovery Channel's show, [em]Mythbusters[/em].
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)