In that post, I described how one of these guys would claim to use science in evaluating relationships. Interestingly enough, this guy is an ardent atheist who ridicules those who believe in the power of prayer. Now I'm not about to argue for or against prayer or God right now. However, I would like to reproduce the words of one bright fella who made an interesting observation.
The point I'm trying to make... is that your definition of a "scientific approach" is not what most people would recognize as science at all. Let's suppose that somebody said that they prayed to Jesus for a miraculous healing and their request was granted. The objection will immediately be raised that the healing might have occurred naturally, and that the only way to determine whether prayer works is to conduct a study with many people suffering from a certain condition, split into two groups, one using prayer and one not. This response is given all the time on this board and elsewhere. In other words, the assertion is that a single person evaluating his or her own experiences cannot be scientific; it's only scientific when you're studying a group.
But then here you are saying that a single person making conclusions based on unique circumstances can be using a scientific approach. In other words, the exact approach that people usually blast for failing to be scientific, now is scientific.
Great answer!
