I've been taking lindy hop dance lessons. I'm not doing too badly, but I'm not great either... and it'll take a while before I develop the confidenced that I need to really do this well. What a bummer.
I really, really wish that I was more of a natural dancer. I also wish that I had a more natural sense of rhythm, and that I could feel the beat of the music accurately. This is very frustrating indeed.
I've got the body strength needed to perform some fancy dance moves, and I've got plenty of stamina. I can engage in energetic moves all night long without tiring. Having said that, I wish I had more style and grace.
Maybe there's some hope. I remember when this one nice nurse gal attended a swing dance for the first time. Toward the end of the night, I asked her to dance, and after a few steps, she asked me if I was an instructor. She also said that I was the best dancer she had met that night, and asked if I could teach her more. Having said that, I do know that I'm not that great. I realize that the really good dancers must not have gotten around to inviting her to dance -- or perhaps they were so caught up amongst themselves that they failed to make her feel welcome. That happens now and then.
Dang, I wish I was better. I'd so love to master balboa, charleston, lindy, and a variety of ballroom styles. And I'll confess... I would appreciate the admiration that comes with being a great dancer. It'd make me more popular with a lot of these social dancers, for example. (Some of them think I'm very good, but I can tell that others think I'm pretty much a big goof.)
Friday, February 29, 2008
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
Fostering creativity
I've been reading this book, The Manager's Pocket Guide to Creativity. Among other things, this little tome discusses various factors that can hinder creativity in the workplace. Here is one of the factors that he mentioned:
"Supervisors discourage individual contemplation and creative thinking because they are not 'physical activities' (people who do them look like they are goofing off)."
Ain't that the truth! My current employer values and fosters creativity, but not all companies do the same. It's important to engage in contemplation and let ideas percolate; however, based on past experiences, I've learned that this can easily be misconstrued. Some managers just don't like that sort of thing, as it can look too much like goofing off.
My current boss knows better, of course. He knows that I'm his go-to guy for a lot of tasks, thag I work hard, and that I often step in to revitalize projects that have crawled to a standstill. Nevertheless, I also believe that it's important to avoid giving the illusion of mere goofing off, lest anybody misconstrue such behavior.
"Supervisors discourage individual contemplation and creative thinking because they are not 'physical activities' (people who do them look like they are goofing off)."
Ain't that the truth! My current employer values and fosters creativity, but not all companies do the same. It's important to engage in contemplation and let ideas percolate; however, based on past experiences, I've learned that this can easily be misconstrued. Some managers just don't like that sort of thing, as it can look too much like goofing off.
My current boss knows better, of course. He knows that I'm his go-to guy for a lot of tasks, thag I work hard, and that I often step in to revitalize projects that have crawled to a standstill. Nevertheless, I also believe that it's important to avoid giving the illusion of mere goofing off, lest anybody misconstrue such behavior.
Monday, February 18, 2008
The H-1B controversy
Time and time again, I hear people complaining about how H-1B work visa applicants are stealing jobs away from hardworking Americans. They say that there are plenty of programmers and engineers who can do the job, so we don't need to be importing all these foreigners.
I think that's a naive view, though. There are plenty of programmers to go around, but there is a lack of good progammers. The problem is probably less severe in engineering, but I'm sure that it's there as well. (Why is this a problem in programming? Because people can easily convince themselves that they know how to program without realizing the need for proper software design and coding elegance. I don't have time to discuss this in great detail, but suffice to say that it's harder to develop that kind of overconfidence when it comes to circuit design or mechanical construction.)
Many also say that H-1B workers drag wage levels down. I think there's some truth to that, but that these claims are also vastly overblown. Moreover, these claims treat jobs and wage levels as though they were part of a zero sum game, which they aren't. No economist would claim that they are.
I think that's a naive view, though. There are plenty of programmers to go around, but there is a lack of good progammers. The problem is probably less severe in engineering, but I'm sure that it's there as well. (Why is this a problem in programming? Because people can easily convince themselves that they know how to program without realizing the need for proper software design and coding elegance. I don't have time to discuss this in great detail, but suffice to say that it's harder to develop that kind of overconfidence when it comes to circuit design or mechanical construction.)
Many also say that H-1B workers drag wage levels down. I think there's some truth to that, but that these claims are also vastly overblown. Moreover, these claims treat jobs and wage levels as though they were part of a zero sum game, which they aren't. No economist would claim that they are.
Thursday, February 07, 2008
The stock market and other stuff
Man, I wish the stock market was doing better right now. Some of my investments have taken a hit, and I really wish that they were doing better.
A friend of mine invested a lot of money in a mortgage firm, and that decision proved to be overly risky. Her reasoning seemed to make sense, as it looked like this company would weather the mortgage crisis -- but it looks like that prediction will be wrong. I feel so bad for her.
I also wish that I had invested in my 401(k) account back at my old job in California. I was very much worried about my future there though, and so I held off on that. I knew that if I had to tap into those savings prematurely, I'd be taking a big hit. As it turns out though, I should have probably invested a bit more at the time.
I'd like to get more reading done. To cut a long story short though, I'm getting pressure from someone to get certain marginally productive things done. I'll spare you the details; suffice to say that it's a frustrating situation.
I'm also trying to master lindy. I'm having a hard time with this, though. I was really off my game tonight.
I got to learn more about this illumination system recently. Very slick.
Oh, and I got to meet some really nifty people tonight. That was a pleasure.
So I've got to get up really early in a couple of days. I'm already quite sleep-deprived. How am I supposed to manage this?
I wish I had a laboratory of my own. That'd be really nice. There are so many ideas that I'd like to work on. Oh, and I'd like to teach a bunch of ex-coworkers about creativity. These were the types of people who simply suppressed innovation on the grounds that it's not how they were used to doing things. Sigh.
A friend of mine invested a lot of money in a mortgage firm, and that decision proved to be overly risky. Her reasoning seemed to make sense, as it looked like this company would weather the mortgage crisis -- but it looks like that prediction will be wrong. I feel so bad for her.
I also wish that I had invested in my 401(k) account back at my old job in California. I was very much worried about my future there though, and so I held off on that. I knew that if I had to tap into those savings prematurely, I'd be taking a big hit. As it turns out though, I should have probably invested a bit more at the time.
I'd like to get more reading done. To cut a long story short though, I'm getting pressure from someone to get certain marginally productive things done. I'll spare you the details; suffice to say that it's a frustrating situation.
I'm also trying to master lindy. I'm having a hard time with this, though. I was really off my game tonight.
I got to learn more about this illumination system recently. Very slick.
Oh, and I got to meet some really nifty people tonight. That was a pleasure.
So I've got to get up really early in a couple of days. I'm already quite sleep-deprived. How am I supposed to manage this?
I wish I had a laboratory of my own. That'd be really nice. There are so many ideas that I'd like to work on. Oh, and I'd like to teach a bunch of ex-coworkers about creativity. These were the types of people who simply suppressed innovation on the grounds that it's not how they were used to doing things. Sigh.
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Comment in a singles profile
I once read an online singles profile which said the following:
"I have friends of all types, but I'm not looking for another "just friend" on here, and I don't have time for world-wide pen-pals -- even with otherwise great people. I promise I'm not a negative person, but because I am in the similars-attract camp rather than the opposites-attract camp and because there's no point wasting anyone's time by lack of full disclosure, things which are deal-breakers and complete turn-offs for me include the following: beer, liquor, smoking, chewing tobacco, gambling, lying, manipulation, cheating (on taxes, girlfriend, timecard, etc.), meanness, perversion, less-than-full-time employment or income of less than 80% of mine, long-distance (anything greater than 25 miles; Garland is on the NE edge of Dallas, TX in the USA), IQ less than 135, history of promiscuity/STDs, history of gay/bi, divorced (more than once, with kids, in the past five years, or for any reason other than her adultery or abandonment of you), shorter than 5'11", fat, under 30 or over 45, less than a full set of teeth, poor personal hygeine, not white/Caucasian, not a U.S. citizen from birth, lack of at least a bachelor's degree, poor grammar, poor spelling, living with parents/family, history of or current psychiatric meds or need thereof (that is if your psychiatrist, doctor, family, friends, coworkers, ex-girlfriends, ex-friends, or ex-coworkers think you need meds -- whether or not YOU think you do), criminal history (whether convicted or not), overall negative attitudes, lack of proven leadership experience, lack of real Christian faith, and lack of regular church involvement. That is not an exhaustive list, but is a good start. If ANY of those describe you, please do NOT write me... especially just to tell me that what is important to me shouldn't be important to me simply because it isn't important to you. You may like crawfish, caviar, or sushi, but I don't; likewise, the above are matters of personal preference to me. You've got your personal list of deal-breakers, too, even if you didn't post it. I'm just saving you time and energy if the above descibe you. Also, I'm going to let my subscription lapse, and will only renew it if I get mail; I will be very disappointed if I then spend (God's) money to renew it only to find mail which starts with, "I know I don't meet your requirements, but...." If you aren't the type of guy I'm looking for, please don't write me. There is somebody ELSE out there for you; may God bless you in your continued search for her."
"I have friends of all types, but I'm not looking for another "just friend" on here, and I don't have time for world-wide pen-pals -- even with otherwise great people. I promise I'm not a negative person, but because I am in the similars-attract camp rather than the opposites-attract camp and because there's no point wasting anyone's time by lack of full disclosure, things which are deal-breakers and complete turn-offs for me include the following: beer, liquor, smoking, chewing tobacco, gambling, lying, manipulation, cheating (on taxes, girlfriend, timecard, etc.), meanness, perversion, less-than-full-time employment or income of less than 80% of mine, long-distance (anything greater than 25 miles; Garland is on the NE edge of Dallas, TX in the USA), IQ less than 135, history of promiscuity/STDs, history of gay/bi, divorced (more than once, with kids, in the past five years, or for any reason other than her adultery or abandonment of you), shorter than 5'11", fat, under 30 or over 45, less than a full set of teeth, poor personal hygeine, not white/Caucasian, not a U.S. citizen from birth, lack of at least a bachelor's degree, poor grammar, poor spelling, living with parents/family, history of or current psychiatric meds or need thereof (that is if your psychiatrist, doctor, family, friends, coworkers, ex-girlfriends, ex-friends, or ex-coworkers think you need meds -- whether or not YOU think you do), criminal history (whether convicted or not), overall negative attitudes, lack of proven leadership experience, lack of real Christian faith, and lack of regular church involvement. That is not an exhaustive list, but is a good start. If ANY of those describe you, please do NOT write me... especially just to tell me that what is important to me shouldn't be important to me simply because it isn't important to you. You may like crawfish, caviar, or sushi, but I don't; likewise, the above are matters of personal preference to me. You've got your personal list of deal-breakers, too, even if you didn't post it. I'm just saving you time and energy if the above descibe you. Also, I'm going to let my subscription lapse, and will only renew it if I get mail; I will be very disappointed if I then spend (God's) money to renew it only to find mail which starts with, "I know I don't meet your requirements, but...." If you aren't the type of guy I'm looking for, please don't write me. There is somebody ELSE out there for you; may God bless you in your continued search for her."
Thursday, January 10, 2008
Freedoms that I cherish
Somebody once asked me what I appreciate having as an adult that I didn't have as a child. Various freedoms come to mind.
For example, growing up, our family was not allowed to set our Betamax player. Why? Because our mother was deathly afraid that it would catch fire. Shortly after we first got the VCR, I progammed it to record one of my favorite shows. When my mother found out, she went ballistic! I was thoroughly castigated for my stupidity; after all, did I not realize how dangerous this was? She insisted that we should never set the timer -- indeed, that we should never even leave the VCR plugged in when it was not in use.
Yes, it was pretty absurd.
Now, please don't get me wrong -- I know that she meant well, and that she had the family's welfare in mind. Still, it was a pretty silly thing to be afraid of, and it was a source of frustration for me. Here we had this wonderful piece of technology that was designed to record programs for our convenience, yet we were not allowed to use that feature, lest the house burn down.
Rats.
For example, growing up, our family was not allowed to set our Betamax player. Why? Because our mother was deathly afraid that it would catch fire. Shortly after we first got the VCR, I progammed it to record one of my favorite shows. When my mother found out, she went ballistic! I was thoroughly castigated for my stupidity; after all, did I not realize how dangerous this was? She insisted that we should never set the timer -- indeed, that we should never even leave the VCR plugged in when it was not in use.
Yes, it was pretty absurd.
Now, please don't get me wrong -- I know that she meant well, and that she had the family's welfare in mind. Still, it was a pretty silly thing to be afraid of, and it was a source of frustration for me. Here we had this wonderful piece of technology that was designed to record programs for our convenience, yet we were not allowed to use that feature, lest the house burn down.
Rats.
Tuesday, January 08, 2008
Likes and dislikes
A few semi-random rantings here.
Stuff I like:
Stuff I dislike:
Stuff I like:
James Herriott Strawberry-banana yogurt Mark Waid Peter David's humor |
Stuff I dislike:
Profanity Crude comments about women Drug abuse Lester, Farley, and Rodney "Sarge" Peter David's political views Richard Dawkins and his attempts at pop philosophy Adam Sandler Adam Carolla Guys who don't treat the women in their life right |
Saturday, January 05, 2008
Stuff I've read
A few things that I've read recently:
I also read this first-hand account regarding scammer E. Sharvit, who attempted to use his moving company to bilk a bunch of people. His name comes up in several online news accounts, all pertaining to his multiple cases of fraud. These shenanigans caused him to be kicked out of the country. I guess this goes to show what greed will do to somebody.
- Parts of Showcase Presents: Batgirl, Volume 1
- Type & layout : how typography and design can get your message across, or get in the way by Colin Wheildon
- Advertising for Dummies
- A stack of articles from various trade publications on electronics and machine design
- This boring book on ad campaigns. I can't even remember the title.
- Various articles on intellectual property law
I also read this first-hand account regarding scammer E. Sharvit, who attempted to use his moving company to bilk a bunch of people. His name comes up in several online news accounts, all pertaining to his multiple cases of fraud. These shenanigans caused him to be kicked out of the country. I guess this goes to show what greed will do to somebody.
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
Recently read books
Here is a partial list of books that I've read recently:
Words That Work: It's Not What You Say, It's What People Hear by Frank Luntz
Advertising for Dummies by Gary R. Dahl
Small Business Marketing for Dummies by Barbara Findlay Schenck
Jump Start Your Business Brain by Doug Hall
Showcase Presents: Batman and the Outsiders by Mike W. Barr et al
Words That Work: It's Not What You Say, It's What People Hear by Frank Luntz
Advertising for Dummies by Gary R. Dahl
Small Business Marketing for Dummies by Barbara Findlay Schenck
Jump Start Your Business Brain by Doug Hall
Showcase Presents: Batman and the Outsiders by Mike W. Barr et al
Saturday, December 08, 2007
Another 'streak' of arrogance
Three years ago, I commented on a certain message board poster. She was arrogant and intolerant beyond belief of differing opinions. She also attempted to shut down anybody who disagreed with her, and she appeared to be immune to civil discourse. Yeah, she was a real piece of work.
For a while, she appeared to have simmered down. In recent months though, I've seen her old persona slip through again. I wonder if she ever truly changed at all.
It looks like she's really hit the fan again. In a current discussion, she's been hurling considerable vitriol at anybody who deigned to voice criticism -- even polite, civil criticism -- of a certain amateur TV script. People tried to explain that dissecting a writer's work is simply part of the normal editorial review process. Frankly though, such explanations should not have been necessary; after all, this is common knowledge.
I really liked what one of the more civil participants in this discussion said. Here is a sampling:
I get the feeling that Rubystreak can be a pretty decent person in some respects. She needs to learn how to tolerate differences in viewpoint though, and to avoid shouting down the people who disagree with her. I voiced the same observation in a previous blog posting, and so I don't think this is an unfair evaluation.
For a while, she appeared to have simmered down. In recent months though, I've seen her old persona slip through again. I wonder if she ever truly changed at all.
It looks like she's really hit the fan again. In a current discussion, she's been hurling considerable vitriol at anybody who deigned to voice criticism -- even polite, civil criticism -- of a certain amateur TV script. People tried to explain that dissecting a writer's work is simply part of the normal editorial review process. Frankly though, such explanations should not have been necessary; after all, this is common knowledge.
I really liked what one of the more civil participants in this discussion said. Here is a sampling:
"Ruby, before I do the point by point thing, a serious question: has it
ever occurred to you that anyone, ever, might know more about literally anything
that you do? Because the breadth of subjects on which you claim expertise is
astounding."
"It is not the fact that you disagree with me that brands you an inadequate
judge. It is the fact that you can brook no disagreement with your opinion, and
have no ability to incorporate the knowledge of those with experience in the
field in question. An adequate judge would consider experienced and trained
opinions, give them weight, use them to add nuance and color to the opinions
they already have. You read a line of Dio's dialogue and say, "I think that's
great," and someone else - someone who evaluates scripts for a living (once
again, I'm referring to others in this thread) - comes in and says that X, Y,
and Z are problematic, and your response is to stick your fingers in your ears
and attack him for daring to speak. Thus does your arrogance make you an
inadequate critic, because a decent critic is capable of learning from others;
you're too certain that you know more about everyf***ingthing than everyone else
in the world to be in any danger of learning from anyone."
"And what you're refusing to address is that the people who've posted
opinions closer to mine than to yours - ie, relatively critical opinions - have
been reasonably nice about it, within the limits of how nice it's possible to be
when submitting criticism. You, on the other hand, blasted the living fuck out
of Pochacco for having the temerity to do something other than tell Diogenes how
wonderful his script is."
I get the feeling that Rubystreak can be a pretty decent person in some respects. She needs to learn how to tolerate differences in viewpoint though, and to avoid shouting down the people who disagree with her. I voiced the same observation in a previous blog posting, and so I don't think this is an unfair evaluation.
Thursday, December 06, 2007
A membrane mounting system
This product announcement discusses a rather nifty system for mounting, sealing, and preserving microtiter plate membranes. I'm familiar with the hardware and techniques used, and trust me, it's a thing of beauty. It's a terrific example of finding an elegant solution that solves multiple problems at once. It provides a terrific way to protect optical patterns formed within the membranes, seal them from the elements, mount them on a flat and optically clear surface, and store them in a highly compact manner.
The way this system works with its matching plate reader is also truly magnificent.
The best engineering solutions solve multiple problems using minimal cost and a minimal number of steps and components. I daresay that it would be nigh impossible to develop a better solution that the system described in this article. I can't divulge the technical details, but trust me -- to anyone who's knowledgeable in this field, it just overflows with elegance.
I know that one other company developed a different technique for solving this problem. Suffice to say that it's a clumsy approach, and one that's practically doomed to fail, thanks to the laws of physics. Knowing something about material properties and material compliance can be truly helpful.
The way this system works with its matching plate reader is also truly magnificent.
The best engineering solutions solve multiple problems using minimal cost and a minimal number of steps and components. I daresay that it would be nigh impossible to develop a better solution that the system described in this article. I can't divulge the technical details, but trust me -- to anyone who's knowledgeable in this field, it just overflows with elegance.
I know that one other company developed a different technique for solving this problem. Suffice to say that it's a clumsy approach, and one that's practically doomed to fail, thanks to the laws of physics. Knowing something about material properties and material compliance can be truly helpful.
Tuesday, December 04, 2007
The old SuperFriends
I've been on a nostalgia kick, catching old episodes of the original SuperFriends show on Boomerang. A lot of people disparage the show, due to its annoying powerless junior SuperFriends (Wendy, Marvin, Wonderdog). I think that's an unfair assessment though, due to the reasons given in this article on the SuperFriends.
I was impressed at the way Aquaman was depicted as a thinking man's hero. In one episode, he was the one who figured out that a certain famous scientist/engineer had most likely faked his own death. He often used his brains to solve problems, rather than simply using his marine telepathy to call for help. And of course, his vast knowledge of marine phenomena was also of immense help.
Robin was likewise shown to be a thinking hero. He worked his way into Dr. Shamon's hideout, for example, and demonstrated his own deductive abilities. He was not just some kid who took orders from the Bat, whipping out whatever Bat-gadget would help save the day. (I hated that!)
I was impressed at the way Aquaman was depicted as a thinking man's hero. In one episode, he was the one who figured out that a certain famous scientist/engineer had most likely faked his own death. He often used his brains to solve problems, rather than simply using his marine telepathy to call for help. And of course, his vast knowledge of marine phenomena was also of immense help.
Robin was likewise shown to be a thinking hero. He worked his way into Dr. Shamon's hideout, for example, and demonstrated his own deductive abilities. He was not just some kid who took orders from the Bat, whipping out whatever Bat-gadget would help save the day. (I hated that!)
Sunday, December 02, 2007
Now that's a clever name
I came across the following name for a chimney sweep company recently: Chimney Cricket. Now that's a clever name. Dick van Dyke would have been proud.
Personally though, I wouldn't use their services unless I had some quotations which showed that their prices were comparable to those of other companies. A clever name can be attention-getting, but one should avoid making it the primary factor in choosing a company.
Personally though, I wouldn't use their services unless I had some quotations which showed that their prices were comparable to those of other companies. A clever name can be attention-getting, but one should avoid making it the primary factor in choosing a company.
Saturday, December 01, 2007
Ten Secrets of a Master Networker
These are from an article by Keith Ferrazzi:
Rule 1: Don't network just to network.
Rule 2: Take names.
Rule 3: Build it before you need it.
Rule 4: Never eat alone.
Rule 5: Be interesting.
Rule 6: Manage the gatekeeper. Artfully.
Rule 7: Always ask.
Rule 8: Don't keep score.
Rule 9: Ping constantly.
Rule 10: Find anchor tenants. Feed them.
Sunday, November 25, 2007
Snowblower and other stuff
Up until today, I had been hunting around for a strong but affordable snowblower. The driveway in my new home is mighty long, and so it would take an awfully long time for me to dig my way out. I needed a snowblower badly.
I was balking at the expense, though. A new snowblower would cost about $349--closer to $376, with taxes. I really wasn't looking forward to that, since I've had a lot of unusual expenses lately. I had to get vinyl siding installed on my garage, and I also had my driveway resealed. On top of that, I had to get part of my flooring replaced, and my sunroom will need some foundation repair in the spring. Add to that some outrageous automotive repair costs, and these expenses really hurt.
Thankfully though, I found a functional snowblower at a second-hand store today. It only cost me $78 plus change, which means that I've saved nearly $300. Thank you, God!
As an aside, somebody gave me an old snowblower last week. I was really hoping that it would work; unfortunately, it was in horribly bad condition. I pretty much gave up on it after my best efforts at getting it to work. At least the expenses that I incurred were pretty minimal.
What else can I ruminate about? Well, I wish that I could attend this conference, as it would be nice to visit Switzerland for a while. Oh, and I borrowed some obscure CDs from the public library. Why? Because the dear, departed Laurie Beechman performed on them. What a voice! What a treasure! What a shame that she's gone.
I was balking at the expense, though. A new snowblower would cost about $349--closer to $376, with taxes. I really wasn't looking forward to that, since I've had a lot of unusual expenses lately. I had to get vinyl siding installed on my garage, and I also had my driveway resealed. On top of that, I had to get part of my flooring replaced, and my sunroom will need some foundation repair in the spring. Add to that some outrageous automotive repair costs, and these expenses really hurt.
Thankfully though, I found a functional snowblower at a second-hand store today. It only cost me $78 plus change, which means that I've saved nearly $300. Thank you, God!
As an aside, somebody gave me an old snowblower last week. I was really hoping that it would work; unfortunately, it was in horribly bad condition. I pretty much gave up on it after my best efforts at getting it to work. At least the expenses that I incurred were pretty minimal.
What else can I ruminate about? Well, I wish that I could attend this conference, as it would be nice to visit Switzerland for a while. Oh, and I borrowed some obscure CDs from the public library. Why? Because the dear, departed Laurie Beechman performed on them. What a voice! What a treasure! What a shame that she's gone.
Thursday, November 15, 2007
Things I'd like to learn
There are an awful lot of things that I'd like to learn about... things that I'd like to master. Here are just a few.
Balboa, lindyu hop, mechanical design, machining, how things work, cryopreservation, Japanese, German, kanji, hiragana, katakana, Latin, microbiology, cellular biology, string theory, M-theory, existentialism, codebreaking, detective work, copywriting, copyrights, intellectual property law, Don Quixote, The Canterbury Tales, Gargantua and Pantagruel, Arthurian legend, Beowulf, combat techniques, archery, fiction writing, theatre, impressionism.
Balboa, lindyu hop, mechanical design, machining, how things work, cryopreservation, Japanese, German, kanji, hiragana, katakana, Latin, microbiology, cellular biology, string theory, M-theory, existentialism, codebreaking, detective work, copywriting, copyrights, intellectual property law, Don Quixote, The Canterbury Tales, Gargantua and Pantagruel, Arthurian legend, Beowulf, combat techniques, archery, fiction writing, theatre, impressionism.
Sunday, November 11, 2007
Dreamcoat comparisons
I recently rewatched the DVD recording of Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat which had Donny Osmond in the title role. It was pretty good, and it had numerous nice touches, such as dressing Potiphar up as though he were a modern corporate bigwig. Still, I can't help but think that it could have had a better cast. Donny was very good, but he wouldn't have been my first choice. Sam Harris might have done a better job, for example.
I also listened to the original London, Broadway, and Canadian cast recordings. It quickly became clear that the narrator, more than any other character, sets the tone and potentially steals the show. I was disappointed in the Canadian version, but I thought that the London recording was pretty good, and I think that Laurie Beechman did an excellent job in the original Broadway version. Her rendition of Pharaoh's Song was positively mesmerizing.
I hear that Jodi Benson once played the part of the narrator as well. That must have been incredible! The Dreamcoat storyline is highly secularized though, which is disappointing. It fails to mention God at all, and it ascribes Joseph's success to "a lucky break." This must not have sat well with both Jodi Benson and Donny Osmond, both of whom are known for their religious convictions. (I have real issues with Mormonism, BTW, so I'm not praising Mr. Osmond's beliefs. However, I do commend him for the parts of his convictions that I do agree with.)
I also listened to the original London, Broadway, and Canadian cast recordings. It quickly became clear that the narrator, more than any other character, sets the tone and potentially steals the show. I was disappointed in the Canadian version, but I thought that the London recording was pretty good, and I think that Laurie Beechman did an excellent job in the original Broadway version. Her rendition of Pharaoh's Song was positively mesmerizing.
I hear that Jodi Benson once played the part of the narrator as well. That must have been incredible! The Dreamcoat storyline is highly secularized though, which is disappointing. It fails to mention God at all, and it ascribes Joseph's success to "a lucky break." This must not have sat well with both Jodi Benson and Donny Osmond, both of whom are known for their religious convictions. (I have real issues with Mormonism, BTW, so I'm not praising Mr. Osmond's beliefs. However, I do commend him for the parts of his convictions that I do agree with.)
Friday, November 09, 2007
Laurie Beechman
I just learned that Laurie Beechman passed away about ten years ago. What a shock. What a shame. Her cast recording of "Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat" was the very first Broadway cast recording that I ever purchased, and it was worth it. I could listen to her sing over and over again.
I liked Kelli Rabke, and I though that Kristine Fraelich was quite fine as well. Both did a wonderful job as the Narrator in this play. Laurie was quite special though, and her voice is completely unforgettable. I wasn't thrilled with her CD of Andrew Lloyd Webber songs, but her performance in "Joseph" was absolutely incredible.
Here's hoping that she's in heaven somewhere. Here's wishing that we could hear her sing one more time. Sigh.
I liked Kelli Rabke, and I though that Kristine Fraelich was quite fine as well. Both did a wonderful job as the Narrator in this play. Laurie was quite special though, and her voice is completely unforgettable. I wasn't thrilled with her CD of Andrew Lloyd Webber songs, but her performance in "Joseph" was absolutely incredible.
Here's hoping that she's in heaven somewhere. Here's wishing that we could hear her sing one more time. Sigh.
Sunday, November 04, 2007
A new set of angels?
A friend and I were discussing costume ideas recently. We talked about the kinds of creative outfits that we'd like to wear at a costume party. She has a twisted sense of humor, so she prefers to add some gory details, whereas I prefer to use costumes that are understated but clever.
She belongs to a trio of friends, and we got to talking about a costume for one of her pals. Her pal is a trim blonde gal, and I suggested that she could go as Cheryl Ladd. There's nothing distinctive about a Cheryl Ladd costume though, so to make this work, we'd need to dress up the entire trio as Charlie's Angels.
Which is a bit of a problem, since the third member of their trifecta is black. Oh, well.
She belongs to a trio of friends, and we got to talking about a costume for one of her pals. Her pal is a trim blonde gal, and I suggested that she could go as Cheryl Ladd. There's nothing distinctive about a Cheryl Ladd costume though, so to make this work, we'd need to dress up the entire trio as Charlie's Angels.
Which is a bit of a problem, since the third member of their trifecta is black. Oh, well.
Saturday, November 03, 2007
Helping the Third World
This is nice. A biotech company is offering to help past customers donate their used analyzers to deserving laboratories in underprivileged nations. This is contingent on upgrading to a newer model, of course, but that's reasonable. After all, it costs time and money to place these units in laboratories that are worthy of these goods.
I think about how much faster science could progress if we could get more scientific research going in the Third World. This would ultimately benefit everyone, especially as scientific progress becomes more equitable.
I think about how much faster science could progress if we could get more scientific research going in the Third World. This would ultimately benefit everyone, especially as scientific progress becomes more equitable.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)