Some buddies of mine are doing some work on bacterial colony counting. The concept is explained here. It's been around for a long time now, and it's commonly used due to its ease and flexibility. Automating the counting process though... that's another matter.

Another friend of mine is doing some biochemistry work at a university back home. I almost wish I could join her, but for a variety of reasons, I'd rather not go back there.

I've got a long and tiring week ahead of me. This stinks. This stinks big-time.

Let's see.  What have I been doing?

Well, I did some reading about the Immune Tolerance Network today, as part of my readings on immunology.  Also read about the Science Board, which I encountered a few months ago.

I've also been reading some of the documents from BD BioSciences.

Earlier, I mentioned the A-Team's Amy Allen. Well, these shots are from the first A-Team episode I ever saw. It's what got me hooked on the show, during its prime.

I have fond memories of that show. Up until then, I had no idea why there was such a buzz about Hannibal and his crew.

The A-Team's Amy Allen is a darned fine-looking woman. She had a willowy figure and nice legs. And she was mighty pretty as well.

She was a fairly strong feminine character, at least for her time. Granted, she was no Emma Peel; however, she showed great potential. If only the writers of "The A-Team" hadn't botched things so royally with her character.

There's a listing of immunology terms and definitions here. It's in a hypertext format, which is kinda nice. It certainly makes for a helpful pedagogical tool.

I mentioned that a friend of mine has expertise in colony counting. She has also done work with viral plaque assays and transwells (whatever the latter may be).

This isn't an earth-shaking thing to comment on, but I thought I'd mention it anyway. I've been learning a lot from her, hence my interest.

I'm lonely.

Jennifer Dempster is one lovely woman.

An old friend of mine is in town this week. She has expertise in colony counting and related technologies.

Okay, so I don't have much to say today. However, I thought the following article on biology in Star Trek was interesting. It's nice to see people analyze the science in these shows.

This blog is filled with angst and pain, but some positive stuff as well.

I wish I knew Portuguese. I learned about Ambriex recently, as part of my on-going education, but I can't make adequate sense of the site, even though Portuguese is similar to Spanish.

In my last posting, I mentioned a manager who blamed an employee because his new embedded computer malfunctioned and died. She was quick to blame the employee, on the grounds that the computer was new and he was the only one using it.

I'm just flabbergasted that any manager would think that new computers don't fail unless the user messes them up. Heck, any technician can tell you that if a computer's going to fail, it will typically do so within its first few days of use! That's when the computer gets put through its paces, thus allow it to be tested under a variety of conditions. Factory testing is very limited in what it can do, and it's simply no substitute for on-site use.

This is the kind of story that one expects to read about in the comic strips, rather than hear about them in real life.

I know of a manager who chewed out an employee because this little embedded computer he was using was on the fritz. The employee didn't feel he should be blamed so quickly, but the manager disagreed, yelling, "New computers do not just break down! If you're alone in a room with a vase and the vase breaks, you either accept responsibility for it or you prove that an earthquake occurred!"

I was reminded of this last week, when I read a PC Magazine article about the rampant customer dissatisfaction with HP and Compaq. A lot of consumers were complaining about the failure rate of their desktop computers, and while not all of them were so unfortunate, a large number were. Heck, my own HP Pavilion laptop broke down four times -- twice during the first year, and all before 15 months were up.

In fact, last summer, I did some research for my then-employer on PCB testing, speaking to both circuit board manufacturers and a professional testing firm. They all confirmed what I knew all along--namely, that boards and components are fairly reliable, but that there are any number of ways in which they can fail. In fact, there are a lot of ways in which they can slip by the testing procedures, since there's simply no way to test them completely.

The idea that the user of a new computer should be blamed for its failure--guilty until proven innocent--is simply misguided. A visceral reaction, rather than a rational one.

I'm kinda depressed today. Rats.

I've also been watching Cocoon: The Return on video. Darn, Courteney Cox looked good back then. (The link in question isn't from this movie, but it does contain some mighty nice-looking pics of Courteney.)

While I'm at it, I'd like to mention Stacey Williams as well. Another stunningly beautiful woman. What I wouldn't give to be with a gal like that.

I've just discovered SciWeb .

Okay, so I'm watching the TVLand award show, and its tribute to classic TV. This reminds me of how incredibly horrid television in my home country was. Ugh. People may complain about how insulting American TV is to one's intelligence, but despite all the dreck, there's a lot of clever and classic stuff out there.

The TVLand tribute itself is pretty darned clever, and entertaining. I've really got to hand it to them.

Some would be quick to say that this is due to economic limitations and our relative lack of technology. Balderdash. Look at the Dick van Dyke show, which was groundbreaking and clever despite ancient technology, simple sets and meager production values. No, TV back home was bad because of a lack of creativity and a general striving for mediocrity.

This is one of the reasons why I feel very uncomfortable amongst my own people. It's almost as though they're unwilling to seek excellence. Heck, I was often ridiculed for wanting to do things well.

I like my job. It's a lot of hard work, but I like it, and I like the people.

The boss is a nice guy, too -- the kind of fellow who's quick to show his appreciation. Not like a lot of other managers, who think that their job is to catch people screwing up and correct them. He actually has heart, and he wants to treat his employees well.

Did you ever have one of those days where you feel like writing something down, but can't think of anything? This is one of those days.

I plan to read about the different types of cytokines today. Maybe that'll get my brain going. Perhaps I'll also read a bit about apoptosis.